Chart 9 is very interesting! If I recall correctly, the majority of stocks that experience a 70% drawdown never recover. However, the median drawdown for the list was 72%!
yes, well there is a fair amount of survivorship bias in that table (being the best performing stocks which suffered a major drawdown), basically it's the ones who got nailed and lived to tell the tale...
Yeah, absolutely. I also found myself curious when the drawdown occurred and how much of it was stock specific. I'd bet a lot of the drawdowns were either 2000 or 2008 which said less about the companies themselves than a single-name collapse in a stable market would.
Which one is your favorite?
Chart 9 is very interesting! If I recall correctly, the majority of stocks that experience a 70% drawdown never recover. However, the median drawdown for the list was 72%!
yes, well there is a fair amount of survivorship bias in that table (being the best performing stocks which suffered a major drawdown), basically it's the ones who got nailed and lived to tell the tale...
Yeah, absolutely. I also found myself curious when the drawdown occurred and how much of it was stock specific. I'd bet a lot of the drawdowns were either 2000 or 2008 which said less about the companies themselves than a single-name collapse in a stable market would.
CAPEX ... the LARGE divergence is driving us to value ... metals ...
Yes sir, and by popular request I'm going to do an "off-topic chartstorm" on commodities soon (I think one of the biggest themes for 2026)
Great collection of information.
Thanks!